Inteligencia artificial en medicina y procedimientos quirúrgicos: impacto en la toma de decisiones y la salud / Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Surgical Procedures: Impact on Decision Making and Health

Introducción: Las revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura constituyen una herramienta metodológica práctica para la búsqueda de información sobre investigaciones clínicas, aplicaciones tecnológicas y la toma de decisiones de impacto en la salud. Objetivo: Describir cómo influye la inteligencia artificial en la toma de decisiones médicas según el grado de concordancia entre estas evidencias y los sistemas expertos aplicados en las especialidades clínicas y quirúrgicas de impacto en la salud, según reportes entre 2010 y 2019. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática con el uso de un modelo de bases de datos relacional y un modelo de entidad relación para garantizar la entidad referencial de la que hacen parte las bases de datos y los artículos, así como la calidad de cada uno de los artículos mediante clasificación por grados de concordancia entre muy concordante o no concordante con la temática de interés y la toma de decisiones de impacto en la salud. Conclusiones: Las aplicaciones como los sistemas expertos, los aprendizajes de máquinas y la robótica aportan innovación a las instituciones y un cambio revolucionario en lo académico, clínico y epidemiológico(AU)

Introduction: Systematic reviews of the literature constitute a practical methodological tool for the search of information on clinical research, technological applications and health impact decision-making. Objectives: To describe how artificial intelligence influences medical decision-making according to the degree of agreement between this evidence and the expert systems applied in clinical and surgical specialties with an impact on health, according to reports from 2010 to 2019. Methods: A systematic review was conducted with the use of a relational database model and a relationship entity model to guarantee the referential entity of which the databases and articles are part, as well as the quality of each of the articles classified by degrees of agreement between very concordant or not concordant with the topic of interest and the decision making of impact on health. Conclusions: Applications such as expert systems, machine learning and robotics bring innovation to institutions and a revolutionary change in academic, clinical and epidemiological areas(AU)

Perfil do atendimento fonoaudiológico voltado para a Comunicação Suplementar e Alternativa / Profile of speech-language pathology care focused on Augmentative and Alternative Communication

RESUMO Objetivo identificar os principais aspectos na tomada de decisão para indicar o uso da Comunicação Suplementar e Alternativa (CSA), bem como características de intervenção. Métodos trata-se de um estudo prospectivo. Foi elaborado um questionário eletrônico para envio a fonoaudiólogos com experiência clínica na área de CSA há cinco anos ou mais, objetivando o levantamento dos dados para esta pesquisa. Resultados verificou-se predomínio de atuação na clínica, com crianças pequenas, sobretudo para casos de transtorno do espectro do autismo e apraxia de fala na infância. Houve divergência de relato de tecnologia abordada e exemplificação de recurso utilizado. A maioria referiu dificuldades de adesão ao trabalho, atribuídas, principalmente, por dificuldades de compreensão do que é a CSA por parte dos familiares e de outros profissionais. Conclusão há escassez de pesquisas e de capacitação profissional para a área de CSA. O investimento nessas fragilidades faz-se necessário para ampliar o uso consciente da CSA e favorecer ações de conscientização de outros profissionais e de familiares.

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study is to identify the main aspects of the decision-making process indicating the use of Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC), as well as characteristics of the interventions. Methods This is a prospective study, which was submitted to and approved by the Ethics and Research Committee. An electronic questionnaire was created and sent to speech therapist professionals to collect data for this research, with a minimum of 5 years clinical experience in the AAC area. Results We found a predominance in the clinic, of work with young children, especially in cases of ASD and CAS. There is a divergence in the reporting of the addressed technology and the example of the used resource. Most report difficulties in adherence to AAC, mainly due to lack of understanding what AAC is all about and barriers from family members and other professionals. Conclusion There is a lack of research and professional training in the AAC area. Therefore, investing in these areas is necessary to expand the conscious use of AAC and to promote awareness of other professionals and family members.

La auscultación pulmonar en el siglo 21 / Lung auscultation in the 21th century

La auscultación pulmonar es parte fundamental del examen físico para el diagnóstico de las enfermedades respiratorias. La estandarización que ha alcanzado la nomenclatura de los ruidos respiratorios, sumado a los avances en el análisis computacional de los mismos, han permitido mejorar la utilidad de esta técnica. Sin embargo, el rendimiento de la auscultación pulmonar ha sido cuestionado por tener una concordancia variable entre profesionales de la salud. Aun cuando la incorporación de nuevas herramientas diagnósticas de imágenes y función pulmonar han revolucionado la precisión diagnóstica en enfermedades respiratorias, no existe tecnología que permita reemplazar la técnica de auscultación pulmonar para guiar el proceso diagnóstico. Por una parte, la auscultación pulmonar permite seleccionar a aquellos pacientes que se beneficiarán de una determinada técnica diagnóstica, se puede repetir cuantas veces sea necesario para tomar decisiones clínicas, y frecuentemente permite prescindir de exámenes adicionales que no siempre son fáciles de realizar o no se encuentran disponibles. En esta revisión se presenta el estado actual de la técnica de auscultación pulmonar y su rendimiento objetivo basado en la nomenclatura actual aceptada para los ruidos respiratorios, además de resumir la evidencia principal de estudios de concordancia de auscultación pediátrica y su análisis objetivo a través de nueva tecnología computacional.

Lung auscultation is an essential part of the physical examination for diagnosing respiratory diseases. The terminology standardization for lung sounds, in addition to advances in their analysis through new technologies, have improved the use of this technique. However, traditional auscultation has been questioned due to the limited concordance among health professionals. Despite the revolu tionary use of new diagnostic tools of imaging and lung function tests allowing diagnostic accuracy in respiratory diseases, no technology can replace lung auscultation to guide the diagnostic process. Lung auscultation allows identifying those patients who may benefit from a specific test. Moreover, this technique can be performed many times to make clinical decisions, and often with no need for- complicated and sometimes unavailable tests. This review describes the current state-of-the-art of lung auscultation and its efficacy based on the current respiratory sound terminology. In addition, it describes the main evidence on respiratory sound concordance studies among health professionals and its objective analysis through new technology.

O processo de tomada de decisão médica em tempos de pandemia por coronavírus / The medical decision-making process in the time of the coronavirus pandemic

RESUMO A pandemia causada pelo novo coronavírus tem provocado mudanças significativas no processo de tomada de decisão médica diante do paciente grave. Repentinamente, aumentaram as admissões em unidades de tratamento intensivo, porém, muitos desses casos não apresentam quadros relacionados à infecção viral, mas à exacerbação de doenças preexistentes. Nesse contexto, precisamos evitar que o processo decisório intuitivo e a insegurança nos levem a exaurir a disponibilidade de leitos críticos, antes do momento em que eles sejam realmente necessários, mesmo reconhecendo a importância do método decisório rápido em situações emergências. Uma das melhores formas de atingir esse propósito talvez seja por meio da prática da metacognição e da estruturação de formas de feedback regulares aos profissionais envolvidos em processos decisórios inerentemente rápidos.

ABSTRACT The disease pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus has triggered significant changes in the medical decision-making process relating to critically ill patients. Admissions to intensive care units have suddenly increased, but many of these patients do not present with clinical manifestations related to the viral infection but rather exacerbation of preexisting diseases. In this context, we must prevent intuitive decision-making and insecurity from leading us to exhaust the available critical-care beds before they are truly necessary, while still recognizing the importance of rapid decision-making in emergency situations. One of the best ways to achieve this goal may be by practicing metacognition and establishing ways for regular feedback to be provided to professionals engaged in inherently rapid decision-making processes.

Recomendaciones para la implementación de la metodología CICOM durante la respuesta COVID-19 / Recommendations for the implementation of the CICOM methodology during the COVID-19 response

Las recomendaciones técnicas del presente documento tienen como objetivo orientar sobre la metodología para implementar las Células de Información y Coordinación Médica (CICOM) como función clave de los COE de salud para facilitar la toma de decisión en la expansión de capacidades a través del despliegue de equipos médicos de emergencia y la instalación de sitios alternativos de atención médica (SAAM) y en cooperación con las redes integrales de servicios de salud y los sistemas de atención prehospitalaria.

Guía de práctica clínica Ibero-Latinoamericana sobre la esofagitis cáustica en Pediatría: aspectos terapéuticos (2a. Parte) / Ibero-Latinamerican Clinical Practical Guidelines on pediatric caustic esophagitis: therapeutical aspects (Part 2)

Resumen: La ingestión de cáusticos representa un grave problema médico-social por las consecuencias devastadoras e irreversibles que puede producir en el tracto digestivo superior. En Iberoamérica no se han publicado datos fidedignos sobre la incidencia o la prevalencia de lesiones inducidas por cáusticos. La información disponible sobre la presentación clínica, diagnóstico, tratamiento y pronóstico se basa en series retrospectivas de casos y, de hecho, su manejo clínico se sustenta en muchos casos fundamentalmente en la opinión de expertos. Recientemente como una iniciativa de la Sociedad Latinoamericana de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica (SLAGHNP) y con la co laboración de colegas de la Sociedad Española de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediá trica (SEGHNP), hemos diseñado una Guía de Práctica Clínica (GPC) la cual incluye una serie de enunciados y recomendaciones dirigidos a optimizar la atención a los pacientes y que se basan en la revisión sistemática de la evidencia. En dos (2) manuscritos sucesivos nos hemos enfocado primero, en los aspectos fisiopatológicos y de diagnóstico clínico-endoscópico de la esofagitis cáustica en niños (1a. Parte) y en segundo lugar, en los aspectos más relevantes del tratamiento (2a. Parte). Esperamos esta guía se convierta en una herramienta útil para el clínico en el difícil proceso de toma de decisio nes a la hora de evaluar un paciente posterior a la ingesta de una sustancia cáustica.

Abstract: Caustic ingestion represents a serious social-medical problem due to the devastating and irreversible consequences it can produce in the upper digestive tract. In Ibero-America, there are no published reliable data on the incidence or prevalence of caustic-induced injuries, and most of the available information on clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis is based on retrospective clinical series and, indeed, its clinical management is often based primarily on expert opinion. Re cently as an initiative of the Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (LASPGHAN) and with the cooperation of the Spanish Society for Pediatric Gastroente rology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SEGHNP), we have designed a Clinical Practice Guideline that include a series of statements and recommendations aimed at optimizing patient medical care which is based on the systematic review of evidence. Two (2) separate papers focused on the evaluation of physiopathological and clinical-endoscopic diagnostic features of caustic esophagitis in children (1st. Paper) and, on the other hand, the most relevant therapeutic considerations (2nd. Paper). We expect this guideline to become a useful tool for the physician in the difficult decision-making process when assessing patients after caustic ingestion.

Lineamiento estandarizado para la Vigilancia Epidemiologica y por laboratorio de enfermedad por 2019-NCoV / Standardized guideline for Epidemiological Surveillance and by disease laboratory for 2019-NCoV

Este documento describe la situación epidemiológica de la enfermedad por 2019-nCoV, los lineamientos para la detección y seguimiento de los casos, así como los aspectos de la toma, manejo y envío adecuado de las muestras y el control analítico disponible para la confirmación de los casos.

Adolescent patients and the clinical decision about their health / O paciente adolescente e a deliberação clínica sobre a sua saúde

ABSTRACT Objective: To carry out a review of the literature on adolescents' participation in decision making for their own health. Data sources: Review in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and PubMed databases. We consider scientific articles and books between 1966 and 2017. Keywords: adolescence, autonomy, bioethics and adolescence, autonomy, ethics, in variants in the English, Portuguese and Spanish languages. Inclusion criteria: scientific articles, books and theses on clinical decision making by the adolescent patient. Exclusion criteria: case reports and articles that did not address the issue. Among 1,590 abstracts, 78 were read in full and 32 were used in this manuscript. Data synthesis: The age at which the individual is able to make decisions is a matter of debate in the literature. The development of a cognitive and psychosocial system is a time-consuming process and the integration of psychological, neuropsychological and neurobiological research in adolescence is fundamental. The ability to mature reflection is not determined by chronological age; in theory, a mature child is able to consent or refuse treatment. Decision-making requires careful and reflective analysis of the main associated factors, and the approach of this problem must occur through the recognition of the maturity and autonomy that exists in the adolescents. To do so, it is necessary to "deliberate" with them. Conclusions: International guidelines recommend that adolescents participate in discussions about their illness, treatment and decision-making. However, there is no universally accepted consensus on how to assess the decision-making ability of these patients. Despite this, when possible, the adolescent should be included in a serious, honest, respectful and sincere process of deliberation.

RESUMO Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão da literatura sobre a participação do adolescente na tomada de decisão sobre a sua saúde. Fonte de dados: Revisão nos bancos Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) e PubMed. Consideramos artigos científicos e livros entre 1966 e 2017. Palavras-chave: adolescência, autonomia, bioética e adolescência, autonomia, ética, em línguas inglesa, portuguesa e espanhola. Critérios de inclusão: artigos científicos, livros e dissertações que contemplassem a tomada de decisão clínica pelo paciente adolescente. Critérios de exclusão: relatos de caso e artigos que não abordavam a questão norteada nesta pesquisa. Do total de 1.590 resumos, 78 foram lidos na íntegra, e 36, utilizados neste manuscrito. Síntese dos dados: A idade em que o indivíduo é capaz para tomar decisões é motivo de debate na literatura. O desenvolvimento de um sistema cognitivo e psicossocial é um processo demorado, e faz-se fundamental a integração da investigação psicológica, neuropsicológica e neurobiológica na adolescência. A capacidade de reflexão madura não é determinada pela idade cronológica; em teoria, um menor maduro seria capaz de consentir ou recusar um tratamento. A tomada de decisão exige análise cuidadosa e reflexiva dos principais fatores associados, e a abordagem desse problema deve ocorrer por meio do reconhecimento da maturidade e da autonomia que existe no adolescente. Para tanto, é necessário "deliberar" com ele. Conclusões: Diretrizes internacionais recomendam que os adolescentes participem de discussões sobre sua doença, tratamento e tomada de decisão, entretanto não há nenhum consenso universalmente aceito sobre como avaliar a capacidade de decisão desses pacientes. Apesar disso, quando possível, o adolescente deve ser incluído em um processo sério, honesto, respeitoso e sincero de deliberação.

Avaliação da veia cava inferior na decisão de fluidoterapia em cuidados intensivos: implicações práticas / Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications

RESUMO A ressuscitação hídrica do paciente em falência circulatória aguda tem como um de seus objetivos aumentar o volume sistólico e, consequentemente, o débito cardíaco, para melhor oxigenação dos tecidos. Contudo, isso não se verifica em cerca de metade dos pacientes, que são considerados não respondedores a fluidos. A avaliação da resposta a fluidos antes de sua administração pode selecionar os pacientes que devem ter benefício e evitar o risco de sobrecarga nos restantes. Os parâmetros dinâmicos de avaliação da resposta a fluidos têm se revelado promissores enquanto fatores preditores. Entre estes, a medição ecocardiográfica da variação respiratória do diâmetro da veia cava inferior é um método de fácil aplicação, que tem sido difundido na avaliação hemodinâmica em unidades de cuidados intensivos. No entanto, a aplicabilidade desta técnica tem muitas limitações, e os estudos, até à presente data, são heterogêneos e pouco consistentes em alguns grupos de pacientes. Realizamos uma revisão sobre a utilização da variação respiratória do diâmetro da veia cava inferior, medida por ecocardiografia transtorácica, na decisão de administrar fluidos ao paciente em falência circulatória aguda, em cuidados intensivos, incluindo potencialidades e limitações da técnica, de sua interpretação e a evidência existente.

ABSTRACT The fluid resuscitation of patients with acute circulatory failure aims to increase systolic volume and consequently improve cardiac output for better tissue oxygenation. However, this effect does not always occur because approximately half of patients do not respond to fluids. The evaluation of fluid responsiveness before their administration may help to identify patients who would benefit from fluid resuscitation and avoid the risk of fluid overload in the others. The dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness evaluation are promising predictive factors. Of these, the echocardiographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is easy to apply and has been used in the hemodynamic evaluation of intensive care unit patients. However, the applicability of this technique has many limitations, and the present studies are heterogeneous and inconsistent across specific groups of patients. We review the use of the inferior vena cava diameter respiratory variation, measured via transthoracic echocardiography, to decide whether to administer fluids to patients with acute circulatory failure in the intensive care unit. We explore the benefits and limitations of this technique, its current use, and the existing evidence.

Toma de decisiones para el tratamiento de caries oclusales en el sistema de salud público brasileño / Decision-making for the treatment of occlusal caries in the Brazilian public health system

ABSTRACT Introduction: Caries diagnosis errors have become a public health problem. Objective: Verify the consistency in terms of decision-making between Brazilian dentists from the country's public health system and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), and evaluate the influence of professional experience on the management of the decay. Methods: There are 80 dentists in the public health service of Recife city, Brazil. All dentists were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. Forty dentists agreed to answer questions about their decision-making in relation to the treatment of occlusal caries in low, moderate and high-risk caries situations. The time of clinical experience, the use of methods for the assessment of caries risk and the lesion activity were also inquired about. The T-test was applied with a significance level of 5 por ciento to compare the correlation between the International Caries Detection and Assessment System scores regarding the mean age of participants. Results: The disagreement between the dentists and the criteria used by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System for decision-making were mainly related to the sound surfaces or lesions restricted to the tooth enamel. It was thus verified that lack of consistency for the low-risk condition reached a score of 3 (32 percent), while moderate (95 percent) and high-risk (85 percent) conditions lay at a classification code of 0. The time of professional experience was not considered to have interfered with decision-making on any scale, regardless of the risk condition of the patient (p> 0.05). Conclusions: A divergence in terms of decision-making between dentists of the public health system and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System could be observed, specifically regarding sound surfaces or surfaces with lesions restricted to the tooth enamel. Furthermore, professional experience was seen as not influencing the management of caries(AU)

RESUMEN Introducción: Los errores de diagnóstico de caries se han convertido en un problema de salud pública. Objetivo: Verificar la concordancia de la toma de decisiones entre los dentistas brasileños del sistema de salud pública del país y el Sistema Internacional de Detección y Evaluación de Caries (ICDAS), así como evaluar la influencia de la experiencia profesional en el manejo de la caries. Métodos: De los 80 dentistas que existen en servicio público de salud en la ciudad de Recife, Brasil, todos fueron invitados a participar en este estudio transversal. Cuarenta dentistas acordaron responder sobre su toma de decisión en relación con el tratamiento de la caries oclusal en situaciones de caries de bajo, moderado y alto riesgo. El tiempo de experiencia clínica, el uso de métodos para la evaluación del riesgo de caries y la actividad de la lesión también fueron cuestionados. La prueba T, para un nivel de significancia del 5 por ciento, fue aplicada para comparar la correlación entre los escores del Sistema Internacional de Detección y Evaluación de Caries en relación con el promedio de edad de los participantes. Resultados: El desacuerdo entre los dentistas y los criterios utilizados por el ICDAS para la toma de decisiones se concentró en los códigos de clasificación que representan superficies sanas o lesiones restringidas al esmalte de los dientes. Se verificó así que la falta de consistencia para la condición de bajo riesgo se concentró en la puntuación de 3 (32 por ciento), mientras que las condiciones moderada (95 por ciento) y de alto riesgo (85 por ciento) se concentraron en los códigos de clasificación de 0. El factor tiempo de experiencia profesional no interfirió en la prevalencia de concordancia de la toma de decisión para cualquier escore, independientemente de la condición de riesgo del paciente (p> 0,05). Conclusiones: Se pudo observar una divergencia en cuanto a la toma de decisiones entre los dentistas del sistema de salud pública y el Sistema Internacional de Detección y Evaluación de Caries, específicamente con respecto a superficies sanas o superficies con lesiones restringidas al esmalte de los dientes. Además, la experiencia profesional no influyó en el manejo de la caries(AU)

Rational use of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To assist clinicians to make adequate interpretation of scientific evidence from studies that evaluate diagnostic tests in order to allow their rational use in clinical practice. METHODS: This is a narrative review focused on the main concepts, study designs, the adequate interpretation of the diagnostic accuracy data, and making inferences about the impact of diagnostic testing in clinical practice. RESULTS: Most of the literature that evaluates the performance of diagnostic tests uses cross-sectional design. Randomized clinical trials, in which diagnostic strategies are compared, are scarce. Cross-sectional studies measure diagnostic accuracy outcomes that are considered indirect and insufficient to define the real benefit for patients. Among the accuracy outcomes, the positive and negative likelihood ratios are the most useful for clinical management. Variations in the study's cross-sectional design, which may add bias to the results, as well as other domains that contribute to decreasing the reliability of the findings, are discussed, as well as how to extrapolate such accuracy findings on impact and consequences considered important for the patient. Aspects of costs, time to obtain results, patients' preferences and values should preferably be considered in decision making. CONCLUSION: Knowing the methodology of diagnostic accuracy studies is fundamental, but not sufficient, for the rational use of diagnostic tests. There is a need to balance the desirable and undesirable consequences of tests results for the patients in order to favor a rational decision-making approach about which tests should be recommended in clinical practice.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: Auxiliar os clínicos na interpretação adequada das evidências científicas de estudos que avaliam testes diagnósticos, de modo a permitir seu uso racional na prática clínica. MÉTODOS: Revisão narrativa da literatura dos principais conceitos, desenhos de estudo, interpretação adequada dos dados de acurácia diagnóstica e realização de inferências sobre o impacto do teste diagnóstico na prática clínica. RESULTADOS: A maioria da literatura que avalia o desempenho de testes diagnósticos utiliza como delineamento os estudos transversais. Ensaios clínicos randomizados, avaliando desfechos clínicos, que seriam considerados ideais, são escassos. Os estudos transversais mensuram desfechos de acurácia diagnóstica que são considerados indiretos e insuficientes para definir o real benefício para os pacientes. Dentre os desfechos, as razões de verossimilhança positiva e negativa são as mais úteis para a decisão da conduta clínica. Variações no delineamento transversal do estudo, que podem acrescentar vieses aos resultados, bem como outros domínios que contribuem para diminuir a confiabilidade dos achados, são discutidos, além de como extrapolar tais achados de acurácia em impacto e consequências consideradas importantes para o paciente. Aspectos sobre custos, tempo para a obtenção do resultado, preferências e valores dos pacientes devem, preferencialmente, participar da tomada de decisão. CONCLUSÃO: Conhecer a metodologia dos estudos de acurácia diagnóstica é fundamental, porém não suficiente, para o uso racional de testes diagnósticos. Há a necessidade de se ponderarem as consequências desejáveis e indesejáveis dos resultados dos testes para os pacientes, de modo a favorecer a tomada de decisão racional acerca de qual teste recomendar na prática clínica.

Bases científicas del razonamiento clínico: inferencia Bayesiana / Bayesian inference in clinical reasoning

A conceptual analysis of diagnostic reasoning in clinical practice is carried out. Using Bayesian inference as an alternative to frequentist inference usually used in science, clinical reasoning uses the scientific method step by step. The concepts of scientific method, probability, statistics and Bayesian inference are reviewed, highlighting their fundamental differences with the frequentist approach. This paper shows how the diagnostic approach proceeds in a Bayesian sense, ending with a basic example of application.

Displasia fibrosa: parámetros a considerar para la decisión quirúrgica / Fibrous dysplasia: parameters to be considered for surgical decision making

Introducción: La displasia fibrosa es una patología benigna, poco frecuente, que afecta los huesos, se caracteriza por remplazo gradual del tejido óseo por fibroso, que genera alteraciones óseas estéticas y funcionales; histológicamente presenta una proliferación excesiva de las células mesenquimales que forman hueso. Objetivo: Conocer los aspectos relacionados con la toma de decisiones, con relación con el tratamiento quirúrgico o la opción de controles clínicos y radiográficos, en la displasia fibrosa. Presentación del caso: Se reportan dos casos clínicos de pacientes pediátricos, que acudieron al Hospital Napoleón Franco Parejas de Cartagena-Colombia, por presentar displasia fibrosa, que generó asimetría facial unilateral, y compromete la estética del paciente y no se reportó sintomatología dolorosa; se describen características de la patología y criterios básicos, útiles en la toma de decisión terapéutica, ya sea abordaje quirúrgico radical, conservador o solo realizar control clínico y radiográfico de la lesión. Conclusiones: Los criterios clínicos como asimetría facial, deformidad estética y el compromiso funcional, son básicos en la elección quirúrgica como opción terapéutica, en la displasia fibrosa(AU)

Introduction: Fibrous dysplasia is an uncommon, benign pathology that affects the bones and is characterized by the gradual replacement of bone tissue by a fibrous one, creating aesthetic and functional bone disorders. Histologically, it presents an excessive proliferation of the mesenchymal cells that form the bone. Objective: To know the aspects related to decision making, regarding surgical treatment or the option of carrying out clinical and radiographic controls of fibrous dysplasia. Case presentation: We report two cases of pediatric patients who attended the Children´s Hospital Napoleón Franco Pareja (HINFP) in Cartagena-Colombia presenting fibrous dysplasia that produced unilateral facial asymmetry compromising the aesthetics of patients, but reporting no painful symptoms. We describe the characteristics of the pathology and the basic useful criteria in making therapeutic decisions, with either conservative radical surgical approach or only performing a clinical and radiographic control of the lesion. Conclusions: Clinical criteria such as facial asymmetry, aesthetic deformity, and functional commitment are basic aspects in the therapeutic option for patients with in fibrous dysplasia(AU)

Value-based medicine in oncology: the importance of perspective in the emerging value frameworks

Recently, professional and healthcare-related entities have launched frameworks designed to assess the value of cancer innovations in multistakeholder decision processes. Among the most visible entities that propose and implement value frameworks in oncology are the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). However, these value frameworks have been criticized for conceptual inconsistencies, inability to include a greater variety of value criteria, and inadequate explanation of the uncertainty approach used in the modeling process. On the other hand, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a set of methods and processes that allow the multiple criteria involved in a decision to be explicitly addressed. This approach allows the identification of relevant decision criteria, gathering of evidence based on scientific literature, attribution of weights to the criteria and scores to the evidence raised, and aggregation of the weighted scores to constitute a global metric of value. The purpose of this article is to review the main features of these value frameworks in oncology and the importance of perspective for framework readiness to support healthcare decision-making based on MCDA methodology.